FDA Issues New Guidance to Help Food Facilities Meet Registration Requirements

On May 25, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a Small Entity Compliance Guide (SECG) to help food facilities meet their registration requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

The FD&C Act requires food facilities engaged in manufacturing/processing, packing, or holding of food for human or animal consumption in the United States to register with the FDA. The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) added new registration provisions to the FD&C Act. In 2016, FDA issued a final rule to reflect these changes, which include the following:

• Facilities are required to provide FDA with assurance that they will be permitted to inspect their facility (in accordance with the FD&C Act).
• Facilities are required to renew their registration every other year.
• FDA now has the authority to suspend a facility’s registration.

Under the 2016 final rule, additional information is also required that supports FDA’s ability to respond quickly to food-related emergencies and that will also help the agency more efficiently use the resources it has for inspections.

The SECG explains which types of facilities are required to register, and when and how to do that. The guide also explains the consequences for facilities that fail to register or to renew their registration as required. In addition, the guide explains when FDA can suspend a facility’s registration and the effect of a suspension order. To further assist small facilities, the SECG includes an “At-a-Glance” that summarizes all of the key information in the document.

Diaz Trade Consulting provides both registration and U.S. Agent services to food facilities. To register or find more information about registration, owners and operators of facilities should visit www.FDA-USA.com. For More Information check out the Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration (7th Edition)-Revised.

FDA Takes New Steps in Oversight of Imported Foods

FDA announced that it has recognized the first accreditation body under the voluntary Accredited Third-Party Certification Program created by the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The organization being recognized is ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB), an organization jointly owned by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American Society for Quality (ASQ) based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This organization is being recognized because it met the applicable FDA requirements, validated through application review and on-site assessment.  FDA is recognizing ANAB for a five year term of recognition. (For more information on FDA’s standards for recognition, see: Key Facts about the Accredited Third-Party Certification Program)

FDA Announces Enforcement Discretion Under FSMA

On January 4, 2011, Congress enacted the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), aiming to protect the public by ensuring the U.S. food supply is safe through prevention and enforcement. The FSMA included seven foundational rules, which we summarized in our FSMA: Stay Compliant with DTL’s ‘PICTURE’! blog.

Here's a Recap of Part II of our #WorldTradeMonth Seminar Series for Compliance Professionals on FDA FSMA and FSVP

Yesterday, we at DTL, had the pleasure of hosting Part II of our #WorldTradeMonth Seminar Series for Compliance Professionals. The second seminar focused on FDA FSMA (Food Safety Modernization Act) Compliance for Importers with expert speakers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and industry. We had a packed house with an array of attendees such as importers of food, beverages, and medical devices, along with customs brokers, freight forwarders / NVOCCs, lawyers, consultants, and others. We received requests for a re-cap from those who attended and industry members who were not able to attend. You asked and we deliver. Here is our recap:

The morning kicked off with a networking breakfast where experienced and novice industry members were able to engage in meaningful dialogue about overlapping issues they experience in their respective workplaces in dealing with the topic of FSMA. We heard comments from small to large business on their current implementation strategies in place to ensure they meet FSMA requirements by FDA’s compliance dates.

The seminar promptly began at 9:00 am with introductory remarks by our own President, Jennifer Diaz. We had all attendees introduce themselves and include why this seminar was important to attend. We were glad to hear from majority of attendees that their reason for participating was to further their education on FSMA. One attendee commented, “Excited to hear from FDA about FSVP requirements and what the broker’s role is in the process.”

Next Representatives of Miami Free Zone explained their role in international business solutions as it provides users and visitors with convenient international business resources including turnkey FTZ solutions for distribution; a wholesale marketplace; an international business center environment; and premium showroom, office, and warehouse spaces. As well as providing FTZ users with flexible control over their domestic and foreign inventory, duty elimination and deferment, and high security standards for their businesses and valuable merchandise.

The first speaker was Elena O. Asturias, is a licensed U.S. Customs Broker, and Certified Customs Specialist providing customs brokerage services for imports. Elena provided top tips for custom brokers as she has been involved in logistics for over fifteen years, and has experience handling a broad range of commodities. Some helpful tips from here presentation include:

• Make sure food facilities that must be registered with the FDA pursuant to the Bioterrorism act are registered to avoid delays upon entry into the U.S.
• A major issue causing FDA to detain food products are product labeling violations
• Ensure you use correct Affirmation of Compliance (AofC) Codes
  • When the entry is filed with FDA, use AofC codes to affirm the products meets specific import requirements.
  • Depending on the product type, many AofC’s are required, and must be submitted upon time of entry.
  • The AofC is a 3 letter indicator, then the qualifier which will vary in format. In some cases no qualifier is required.
    • Examples: PFR is the code used to designate a Manufacturer Food Facility Registration Number and it’s used with a 11 digit qualifier.
      • PFR 12345678901
      • FDA Affirmation of Compliance (AofC) Code Quick Reference
• FSVP – Unique facility identifier (UFI)
  • As of May 30th, you will need to add the UFI (Unique Facility Identifier) when you transmit the entry.
  • The AofC code being added is FSV, which will require the following:
    • DUNS number (as acceptable UFI)
    • Importer name & address
    • Email address
    • If the importer doesn’t have a DUNS number yet, you can transmit UNK “unknown” temporarily.
  • ENTRY DATA TRANSMISSION PROCESS:

• ITACS
  • ITACS – Import Trade Auxiliary Communications System
  • Importers are able to see the current FDA status (as long as they have the entry number), using the ITACS system (you have the ability to monitor your shipments without having to call your broker!).

Lundy Patrick followed Mrs. Asturias’ presentation and echoed the significance of being familiar with the importation process. Mr. Patrick is Lieutenant Commander serves as a U.S. Public Health Officer assigned to the Florida District Office of the FDA as an Imports Compliance Officer.  There were questions and answers during his presentation as the attendees had submitted questions prior to the seminar.  Here are highlights from the discussion:

• Articles are expected to be in compliance AT THE TIME OF ENTRY. Therefore, you need to exercise due diligence to make sure the products you intend to import are in compliance PRIOR to the importation of the goods.
• The following food imports require Prior Notice:
  • Food imported for use, storage, or distribution in the U.S. (including gifts and trade and quality assurance/quality control and market research samples)
  • Food transshipped through the U.S. to another country
  • Food imported for future export, or food for use in a Foreign Trade Zone, unless it is on the list of exemptions
• If you fail to provide Prior Notice, the food shipment is subject to refusal and, if refused, must be held at the port of entry unless directed to another location. The importing or offering for import into the U.S. of an article of food in violation of Prior Notice requirements is a "Prohibited Act" under the laws FDA administers.
• If a food product is assigned for examination/sampling, FDA will examine and will collect samples. Historically between 1-2% get examined/sampled.
• Lieutenant Commander Patrick echoed the importance of product label compliance and stressed FDA does not pre-approve labels for food products.
• He stated that the State of Florida, the third busiest district, has had over 8,000+ detention and 2200+ Refusals and provided the top reasons for food product detentions:
  • Labeling Issues:
    • Incorrect or missing statement of identity/name of the food
    • Failure to List potential allergens
    • Failure to declare ingredients
    • Failure to bear nutrition labeling or the nutrition label is in incorrect format.
  • Most common Import Alerts the FDA sees in Florida:
    • IA 16-81 - "Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to the Presence of Salmonella“
    • IA 99-05 - "Detention Without Physical Examination Of Raw Agricultural Products for Pesticides"
  • If Refused Goods are sold and Cannot be Redelivered for Export / Destruction, you may face:
    • Liquidated Damages and/or 19 USC 1592 Penalties

Thereafter, Giselle Jordan took the floor to discuss the hot topic of FSMA Compliance and Foreign Supplier Verification Program. Giselle is a Consumer Safety Officer at the Division of Import Operations of FDA. In August 2016, she joined the newly established Food Safety Verification Program Team. Here are highlights from her presentation:

• Resources:
  • FDA/FSMA   ß SIGN UP (there is a subscription feature available)
• FSMA Sec. 301 requires importers to have FSVPs and FDA to issue regulations.
  • The goal for FSMA is FOOD SAFETY
• Key Principles of FSVP Rule
  • Establishes explicit responsibility for importers to ensure the safety of imported food
  • Risk-based (according to types of hazards, importers, and suppliers)
  • Alignment with PC supply-chain provisions
  • Flexibility in meeting requirements (assessing activities conducted by others)

• Purpose of an FSVP
  • To provide adequate assurances that:
    • Foreign suppliers produce food using processes and procedures providing same level of public health protection as FSMA preventive controls or produce safety provisions
    • Food is not adulterated or misbranded (as it relates to allergen labeling)
  • Who Must Comply?
    • “Importer” is U.S. owner or consignee of a food at time of U.S. entry.
    • If no U.S. owner or consignee at entry, importer is U.S. agent or representative of the foreign owner or consignee, as confirmed in signed statement of consent to serve as the importer under FSVP (“FSVP Importer”).
    • Note that the responsibility for FSVP compliance lies with the FSVP Importer and the FSVP Importer can be different from the Importer of Record.
  • FSVP Exemptions
    • Firms subject to juice or seafood HACCP regulations
    • Food for research or evaluation
    • Food for personal consumption
    • Alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverage ingredients (7%)
    • Food transshipped through U.S.
    • Food imported for processing and export
    • “U.S. foods returned”
    • Meat, poultry, and egg products subject to USDA regulation at time of importation
    • Low acid canned food facilities (microbiological hazards only)
  • Appropriate Verification Activities
    • Must document determination, performance, conduct, review and assessment of results
    • Verification activities include:
    • Onsite audits (qualified auditor), sampling and testing of the food, a review of foreign supplier relevant food safety records, other appropriate activities
  • To qualify as a “Very Small Importer”:
    • Must meet definition of a very small importer
    • Less than $1 million/yr. in human food sales
    • Less than $2.5 million/yr. in animal food sales
    • Annually documentation of eligibility
  • Compliance Dates
    • The final FSVP rule was published on November 27, 2015
    • First compliance date: May 30, 2017
    • Last compliance date: July 27, 2020
    • FSMA Food Guidance Regulation

Jennifer Diaz concluded the seminar with best practices for due diligence and best practices for responding to enforcement actions and FDA Notice of Action. Check out DTL’s TOP 10 TIPS for importing food products into the U.S.

For more information on how we can help you through the maze of importing and FSVP email us at info@diaztradelaw.com.

A special thanks to all our prize winner for participating during the seminar. We appreciate your involvement and interest! For pictures of the event LIKE us on Facebook.

Subscribe Today to keep up with the latest Customs and International Trade Law News.

Our next Live Broadcast webinar will be held on Wednesday, May 24, 2017 to discuss Intellectual Property Rights Violations and the U.S. Customs & Border Protections Enforcement. More information is available here.

DTL will also be at the NEI will be hosting the 3rd annual Global Trade Educational Conference held on August 7-8. NEI is bringing customs brokers, freight forwarders, NVOCCs, OTI, service providers, importers, exporters and all global logistics professionals an opportunity to update themselves on industry developments and connect with colleagues old and new. To RSVP - Read more. . .

*****This document is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice nor does use of this constitute the formation of an attorney-client relationship.******

World Trade Month Seminar Series for Compliance Professionals

In celebration of World Trade Month, Diaz Trade Law is hosting a World Trade Month Seminar Series for Compliance Professionals featuring U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) speakers.

In the first seminar, attendees will learn the ABC’s of Antidumping & Countervailing Duties (AD/CVD) compliance and CBP Enforcement.

In the second seminar, FDA will focus on food importations and discuss the upcoming Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) requirement under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).

The TOP reasons you should attend? 

1. For a limited time, registration is FREE!
2. You have the ability to hear DIRECTLY from CBP and FDA.
3. We want the seminars to be informative and all of your questions answered. In that vain, we are currently taking ANY questions you have related to the Centers of Excellence and Expertise (CEE) and Antidumping & Countervailing Duties (AD/CVD) for CBP, and food importation/FSMA related questions for the FDA. Please email your questions today to info@diaztradelaw.com!

Full details including registration information for BOTH seminars are below. 

May 10, 2017 ( 9 - 11 a.m.)

• ABC’s of AD/CVD & CBP Enforcement
• CLICK HERE for our draft agenda
  • Hear directly from CBP Import Specialists & an industry legal expert
  • TOP Tips when Importing to Ensure Compliance with AD/CVD
  • Valuable opportunity to speak direct with Supervisory Import Specialist with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and legal experts to address any concerns relating to CBP’s role in administering and enforcing imports subject to AD/CVD
  • *** CBP WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM ATTENDEES OF THE TRADE COMMUNITY ON WHAT ISSUES OR QUESTIONS THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE ADDRESSED DURING THE PRESENTATION. PLEASE SUBMIT QUESTIONS TO INFO@DIAZTRADELAW.COM ***
• RSVP HERE

May 18, 2017 ( 9 - 1 2 p.m.)

• FDA FSMA Compliance Seminar for Importers
• CLICK HERE for our draft agenda
  • Hear directly from FDA & an industry legal expert
  • Overview of FDA requirements for importing food products
  • A discussion of best practices when working with your broker to expedite shipments (ACE, ITACS, PREDICT)
  • Overview of the FSMA, including an overview of the FSVP requirement (which has a compliance date of 5/30/17)
  • Best practices for due diligence and responding to enforcement actions and FDA Notices of Action
  • *** FDA WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM ATTENDEES OF THE TRADE COMMUNITY ON WHAT ISSUES OR QUESTIONS THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE ADDRESSED DURING THE PRESENTATION. PLEASE SUBMIT QUESTIONS TO INFO@DIAZTRADELAW.COM ***
• RSVP HERE 

We look forward to seeing you at our World Trade Month events!

Import Food Products? Deadline to Comply with FSVP is May 30, 2017!

What is the FSVP Rule?

The Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) was created on November 27, 2015, as “a significant provision of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)”. The FSVP “shifts the burden of certifying the safety of food imports from [the] FDA to the importers themselves”. This means that importers must set up a program that verifies that both the foreign supplier of the food and the food itself will comply with United States (U.S.) laws.

FSMA: Stay Compliant with DTL’s ‘PICTURE’!

Each year, according to the findings of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention study, 48 million people (1 in 6 Americans) get sick, 128,000 people are hospitalized, and 3,000 people die as the result of food-related diseases. Instead of reacting to this news on a yearly basis, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to do something about it (although not fast enough, some would say) by enacting the Food Safety Modernization Act (“FSMA”). This law, which went into effect on January 4, 2011, aims to protect public health and ensure food safety by placing a greater emphasis on prevention, compliance, and enforcement.

We’ve summarized the seven foundational rules of FSMA for you below. The compliance elements which food facility owner/operators, growers, suppliers, importers, consignees, carriers, and/or accreditation/certification bodies should, at a minimum, incorporate into their 2017 actions plans are highlighted in red (information regarding compliance deadlines for different size-based categories of business can be viewed here). Diaz Trade Law has extensive advising clients on FDA matters and welcomes the opportunity to help your company get FSMA compliant.

Food Importers - FDA Issues New Guidance Aimed at Expediting Your Importations

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) is the most sweeping reform of our food safety laws in more than 70 years and was signed into law by President Obama on January 4, 2011. FSMA aims to ensure the U.S. food supply is safe by shifting the focus from responding to contamination to preventing it. FSMA requires FDA to establish a voluntary, fee-based program, named the “Voluntary Qualified Importer Program” (VQIP) which promises expedited review and importation of foods from importers who achieve and maintain a high level of control over the safety and security of their supply chains.

 On June 4^th, 2015 the FDA published a draft version of “Guidance for Industry: FDA’s Voluntary Qualified Importer Program (VQIP)”.  According to FDA’s website, VQIP will also benefit consumers by enabling the FDA to focus its resources on high risk foods, further protecting consumers from the potential health hazards associated with those foods. In order for a food importer to be eligible for the VQIP program, the importer should:

1. Have at least a 3 year history of importing foods
2. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number
3. Use a paperless filer/broker who received a passing rating during their last FDA evaluation
4. Import food that is not subject to an import alert or Class 1 recall
5. Not be, nor any non-applicant entity associated with the VQIP food be, subject to an FDA administrative or judicial action, have a history of significant non-compliance with food safety, or have one or more voluntary food recalls
6. Assure compliance with several FSMA regulations
7. Possess a current facility certification
8. Have a clear 3 year history with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), meaning no CBP penalties, forfeitures, or sanctions.
9. Pay the annual VQIP user fee before October 1^st of the intended year of participation (FDA estimated flat fee of $16,400 annually), and
10. Develop and implement a Quality Assurance Program (QAP)

Having a robust QAP program is one of the most vital components to have in place to qualify for VQIP and will be one of the largest hurdles for eligibility for those that do not have a QAP program in place. QAP is a compilation of the written polices and procedures a food importer will need in order to ensure adequate control over the safety and security of the foods to be imported. The QAP portion of the VQIP application will be time consuming and difficult to navigate, but with expert help, it can be manageable. FDA believes financial benefits of VQIP will outweigh the efforts in the application process.

FDA estimates that the VQIP program will officially commence in January, 2018.

If you have comments about the draft VQIP, especially the estimated annual fee of $16,400, FDA wants to hear from you by August 19, 2015. FDA will review all comments and publish the final fee in a future Federal Register notice at least 60 days prior to the start of the program. All food importers that want a faster, streamlined supply chain should consider participation in VQIP.

For more information on VQIP, or assistance in developing your QAP program, or want to make sure your voice is heard during the comment period, contact me anytime at jdiaz@bplegal.com.

MANDATORY BIENNIAL REGISTRATION RENEWAL TO TAKE PLACE OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2014

Mandatory Biennial Registration Renewal for Food Facilities will soon be required, on October 1, 2014 until December 31, 2014. If your facility is not re-registered with the FDA by December 31, 2014, FDA will cancel your Bioterrorism Act registration and your importations will be delayed. A FDA Registration number is mandatory to import food products into the U.S.

Here's what you need to know about FDA's new FSMA requirement on Bioterrorism Act registrations.

FDA Finally Issues Definition of "GLUTEN FREE"!

FDA issued the update below DEFINING the term "Gluten Free".   As a Celiac, this is extremely exciting news! The reason this is a HUGE deal?  Us Celiac's need to know we can trust food products that are labeled "gluten free".  If they are not, the repercussions are severe, ranging from serious health problems, including nutritional deficiencies, osteoporosis, growth retardation, infertility, miscarriages, short stature, and intestinal cancers...

My sincere hope is FDA will now test imported products that make "GLUTEN FREE" claims, and assure these companies are legitimately using the gluten free claim.  Meaning, I hope FDA will enforce and penalize those that are importing misbranded product and not correctly utilizing the gluten free claim!  The enforcement tools I will look for include FDA detaining imported product making gluten free claims, and sending them to FDA's own laboratories to check the parts per million of gluten in the product.  If the product contains more than 20 parts per million of gluten, FDA should refuse admission of the product - meaning it would need to be exported or destroyed within 90 days of the refusal, otherwise, companies would face a liquidated damages claim. I also hope FDA will take the added step of adding non-compliant companies to the FDA's Import Alert (black list) so that the products are AUTOMATICALLY stopped before entering the U.S. and the importer is forced to prove compliance prior to getting FDA to release the goods.

The "Compliance Date" for this final rule is August 5, 2014. If consumers see products labeled "gluten free" we should be able to TRUST that those products legitimately do not contain gluten. Now, we have a standard. Products labeled gluten free must contain LESS than 20 parts per million of gluten to be legitimately labeled so.

This is a fantastic start!!! Here's what the FDA had to say, and the actual FINAL RULE is included as a hyperlink at the end.

FDA defines “gluten-free” for food labeling
New rule provides standard definition to protect the health of Americans with celiac disease
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today published a new regulation defining the term "gluten-free" for voluntary food labeling. This will provide a uniform standard definition to help the up to 3 million Americans who have celiac disease, an autoimmune digestive condition that can be effectively managed only by eating a gluten free diet.

“Adherence to a gluten-free diet is the key to treating celiac disease, which can be very disruptive to everyday life,” said FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. “The FDA’s new ‘gluten-free’ definition will help people with this condition make food choices with confidence and allow them to better manage their health.”

This new federal definition standardizes the meaning of “gluten-free” claims across the food industry. It requires that, in order to use the term "gluten-free" on its label, a food must meet all of the requirements of the definition, including that the food must contain less than 20 parts per million of gluten. The rule also requires foods with the claims “no gluten,” “free of gluten,” and “without gluten” to meet the definition for “gluten-free.”

The FDA recognizes that many foods currently labeled as “gluten-free” may be able to meet the new federal definition already. Food manufacturers will have a year after the rule is published to bring their labels into compliance with the new requirements.

“We encourage the food industry to come into compliance with the new definition as soon as possible and help us make it as easy as possible for people with celiac disease to identify foods that meet the federal definition of ‘gluten-free’” said Michael R. Taylor, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine.

The term "gluten" refers to proteins that occur naturally in wheat, rye, barley and cross-bred hybrids of these grains. In people with celiac disease, foods that contain gluten trigger production of antibodies that attack and damage the lining of the small intestine. Such damage limits the ability of celiac disease patients to absorb nutrients and puts them at risk of other very serious health problems, including nutritional deficiencies, osteoporosis, growth retardation, infertility, miscarriages, short stature, and intestinal cancers.

The FDA was directed to issue the new regulation by the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA), which directed FDA to set guidelines for the use of the term “gluten-free” to help people with celiac disease maintain a gluten-free diet.

The regulation was published in the Federal Register.

Join FDA in Miami to Discuss Major FSMA Proposed Rules

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it will hold two additional public meetings to discuss the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Proposed Rules on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP) and the Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies. 

The two proposed rules are designed to strengthen assurances that imported food meets the same safety standards as food produced domestically.  The FSVP proposal provides requirements for importers to verify that their foreign suppliers are implementing the modern, prevention-oriented food safety practices called for by the FSMA, and achieving the same level of food safety as domestic growers and processors. This will create a new burden for importers to know and trust their manufacturers.  I believe we can expect to see enforcement and penalties from FDA - if you have not met your manufacturer yet, now is the time!

The second proposed rule on the Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies provides for the strengthening of quality, objectivity, and transparency of foreign food safety audits on which many U.S. food companies and importers currently rely to help manage the safety of their global food supply chains.

The purpose of the FDA’s public meetings is to solicit public comments on the proposed rules and to inform the public about the rulemaking process (including how to submit comments, data, and other information to the rulemaking dockets), and to respond to questions about the proposed rules.

If you are interested in commenting on these proposed rules, contact me to discuss the process. Please note the timeline below to submit comments to the FDA. 

These two added meetings will take place in Miami, FL and Long Beach, CA.

Register here!

• Miami meeting - October 10-11, 2013, at the Hyatt Regency Miami, 400 SE Second Avenue, Miami, FL 33131.

October 10, 2013

8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

October 11, 2013

8:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.  

• Long Beach meeting - October 22-23, 2013, at the Hilton Long Beach & Executive Meeting Center, 701 West Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, CA  90831

October 22, 2013

8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

October 23, 2013

8:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.

Please note the following important dates for the meetings in Miami, FL and Long Beach, CA:

• Meeting in Miami, FL
  
  
  
  • September 24, 2013: Closing date for request to make oral comment
  
  
  • September 24, 2013: Closing date to request special accommodation due to a disability
  
  
  • October 1, 2013: Closing date for advance registration

• Meeting in Long Beach, CA
  
  
  
  • October 1, 2013: Closing date for request to make oral comment
  
  
  • October 1, 2013: Closing date to request special accommodation due to a disability
  
  
  • October 8, 2013: Closing date for advance registration

• November 26, 2013: Closing date to submit either electronic or written comments to FDA’s Division of Dockets Management; for the proposed rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs, see Docket No. FDA-2011-N -0143. For the proposed rule on Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies, see Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0146.

If you manufacture or import food products you MUST stay on top of FSMA and the new rules FDA will implement.  For assistance in commenting on these important new changes, contact me.  See you at the Miami meeting.

June 10 - FSMA Rules Will be Released!

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been court ordered to set firm dates for FSMA's implementation.  Details of the court case forcing FDA to set these dates, and the organization that sued the FDA to make this happen follow.
Background
The Center for Food Safety (CFS), a national non-profit public interest and environmental advocacy organization, filed a lawsuit against the FDA on August 29, 2012.  The complaint alleged FDA failed to promulgate 7 food safety regulations required by the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).  Congress enacted the FSMA – which was signed into law on January 4, 2011 – to modernize food safety laws and regulations by mandating science-based standards and controls; by providing the FDA with greater authority to prevent and address food safety hazards by taking steps to prevent them from occurring; by strengthening the FDA’s inspection and enforcement powers; and by improving coordination among federal, state, and foreign food safety agencies. CFS documented the foodborne illness outbreaks since FSMA was signed into law, January 4, 2011.

Court Order
The court case is being heard by Judge Phyllis Hamilton, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.  Yesterday, May 21, 2013, Judge Hamilton ordered that the FDA and CFS have an extended deadline of June 10, 2013 to file a joint statement with a mutually agreeable proposed schedule for the outstanding food safety rules.

Rationale for Suit and Missed Deadlines
The ongoing battle between the CFS and FDA to complete this process has lasted for several months. On August 2012, the CFS filed a suit against the FDA Commissioner after the FDA missed a series of deadlines for publishing the regulations mandated by the Food Safety Modernization Act. After numerous deadlines went by without the release of the mandated rules, CFS went to court to try to force FDA to adhere to these time constraints. Following the court appearance, Judge Hamilton ruled that the FDA must come up with a new schedule for issuing the proposed rules by May 20.  This extension came about as a result of the inadequacy in time provided for the FDA and CFS to resolve their differences regarding the schedule FDA suggested to issue the proposed rules.

The FDA sent its updated schedule to CFS on May 15; however, CFS was not satisfied with the proposed timeline. Due to the fact that there were only five days left until the deadline expired, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time. This extension was granted by Judge Hamilton.

New Rules Released by FDA & What's to Come
Since CFS filed its complaint last year, FDA has released some of the key FSMA mandated rules it failed to publish on time, including preventive controls for human food and standards for produce safety, both released in early January. However, there are some rules that are yet to be released. Among them is the foreign supplier verification program (section 301).  This program is set to overhaul import safety, an establishment of regulations to ensure the safe transport of food products and a rule ensuring neutrality of third-party audits.  I think of it akin to C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism).  It's a self-policing and auditing type program that includes functions like  monitoring records for shipments, lot-by-lot certification of compliance, annual on-site inspections, checking the hazard analysis and risk-based preventive control plan of the foreign supplier, and periodically testing and sampling shipments.

I look forward to seeing and reporting on FDA's implementation of FSMA.

FDA Discusses TOP Reasons for Detention of Goods

At today’s Import Operations Training, sponsored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Florida Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association (FCBF), top officials from FDA traveled to Miami to educate importers and brokers. Topics ranged from a general overview of FDA compliance, TOP rationales for FDA detentions, Food Safety and Modernization Act (FSMA) updates, an overview of the newly re-organized (now DIO) Division of Import Operations (formerly DIOP - policy has now been removed), an overview of CBP & FDA’s Joint Team 488 – which handles liquidated damages claims for underlying FDA violations and much more. Highlights of the TOP rationale for detentions follows, as I feel this is of most value to you to know and is arranged by commodity.

Food Products Top Rationales for Detention

•Manufacturer (processor, packer or person holding food product) is not registered with the FDA pursuant to the Bioterrorism Act. (You can Register with the FDA here: www.FDA-USA.com)

•Low Acid Canned Foods (LACF) are imported without establishment registration (FCE #) or scheduled process (SID #)

•The products are subject to an Import Alert

•Product labeling is not compliant (FDA does not pre-approve food labeling, it is up to importers to assure it is compliant before importing)

•Common labeling violations include:

1.Label is not in English

2.Incorrect or missing statement of identity

3.Failure to list allergens

4.Failure to declare ingredients

5.Failure to include a proper “Nutrition Facts” label (incorrect formats for Nutrition Facts labeling is also common) required by 21 C.F.R. 101.9

6.Color additives are not declared correctly (or at all) on the label or not certified

7.Food additives are unsafe or not declared on the label

Dietary Supplements Top Rationales for Detention

•The products are subject to an Import Alert

•Product labeling is not compliant (FDA does not pre-approve dietary supplement labeling, it is up to importers to assure it is compliant before importing)

•Common labeling violations include:

1. Label is not in English

2.Unauthorized health claims

3.Undeclared active ingredients

4.Lacks a “Supplement Facts” panel required by 21 C.F.R. 101.36

5.Failure to list the name of product and “Dietary Supplement” or “Herbal Supplement” on the label

6.Failure to list the appropriate disclaimer necessary when claims are made

Cosmetics Top Rationales for Detention

•The cosmetics are subject to an Import Alert (for example IA 66-38 for cosmetics labeled with drug claims)

•The cosmetics are contaminated and unsafe to use

•The cosmetics are manufactured under unsanitary conditions

•The cosmetics contain a non-permitted color additive

•Product labeling is not compliant (FDA does not pre-approve cosmetic labeling, it is up to importers to assure it is compliant before importing)

•Common labeling violations include:

1. Label is not in English

2.Labeling is missing ingredients

3.Label lacks warnings and adequate directions for use

4.Missing the net quantity of contents

5.Cosmetic contains a “drug” claim

Drugs Top Rationales for Detention

•The cosmetics are subject to an Import Alert (for example IA 66-41 – Unapproved new drugs)

•Drugs are not registered or listed with the FDA

•Product labeling is not compliant (FDA does not pre-approve drug labeling, it is up to importers to assure it is compliant before importing)

•Common labeling violations include:

1.Label is not in English

2.Label does not contain adequate directions for use

3.Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) is not properly labeled or listed

4.Drug contains a “new” chemical or a different dosage making the product a “new drug”

Medical Devices Top Rationales for Detention

•The manufacturers is not registered with the FDA

•The initial importer is not registered with the FDA

•The device is not listed with the FDA

•The product does not contain a 510k or PMA

•Product labeling is not compliant (FDA does not pre-approve medical device labeling, it is up to importers to assure it is compliant before importing)

•Common labeling violations include:

1.Label is not in English

2.Label is false or misleading

Bottom line, as you can see, it is up to you, the importer to perform pre-compliance and assure you get compliance right before you import. FDA expects you to know the requirements and has little mercy if you don’t. Assure you stay compliant and avoid the top rationale for FDA to detain your goods by hiring someone that is extremely knowledgeable with FDA’s laws and regulations and continually stays up to date with the constant changes.  Contact me with any questions!

Significant New Food Safety Rules are Coming

The FDA has proposed two new rules issued under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) that is part of a broader effort to prevent food borne illness and ensure the safety of imported and domestically produced foods. If you want your voice heard, you have until May 16, 2013 to submit your comments to the FDA on the proposed rule. The FDA does take comments seriously, we're here to help if you want assistance in drafting your comments. This rule is expected to be published shortly following the conclusion of the comment period on May 16, 2013.

 The proposed rules would apply to facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food. The rules focus on commonly identified routes of microbial contamination of produce, including:

(1) agricultural water

(2) farm worker hygiene

(3) manure and other additions to the soil

(4) animals in growing areas, and

(5) equipment, tools and buildings.

In general the facilities that are required to register include manufacturers, processors, warehouses, storage tanks, and grain elevators. However, there are a number of exemptions and modified requirements. We would be pleased to assist you in determining whether or not your facility may be exempt from these requirements.

Below is a recap of the proposed rules.

Rule #1 - Preventative Controls for Human Food. The rule proposes firms have written plans in place to identify potential hazards, put in place steps to address them, verify that the steps are working, and outline how to correct any problems that arise. The rule proposes each covered facility to prepare and implement a written food safety plan, which would include the following:

• hazard analysis;
• risk based preventive controls;
• monitoring procedures;
• corrective actions;
• verification; and
• recordkeeping

Do you have your written plan in place yet?

Rule #2 - Produce Safety. The second rule proposes enforceable science- and risk-based safety standards for growing, harvesting, packing and holding fruits and vegetables on foreign and domestic farms. These standards include requirements addressing major areas specific to agriculture that can be the conduit for contaminants:

• Irrigation and other agricultural water
• Farm worker hygiene
• Manure and other additions to the soil
• Intrusion of animals in the growing fields.
• Sanitation conditions affecting buildings, equipment and tools

The proposed rule also includes additional provisions applicable to the growing, harvesting and packing of sprouts, which are more vulnerable in their growing environment to harmful bacteria.

The rules still to come are:

• Foreign Supplier Verification for Importers: This program will require importers to verify that foreign suppliers are following procedures that provide the same level of health protection as that required of domestic food producers. About 15 percent of the food consumed in the U.S. is imported, including about 49 percent of fresh fruit and 21 percent of vegetables.
• Accredited Third Party Certification: The accreditation of third-party auditors would help ensure that food producers in other countries comply with U.S. food safety laws.
• Preventive Controls for Animal Food: This is the implementation of preventive controls at animal food facilities that are similar to those proposed for human food.

As FDA implements more of FSMA, we will keep you informed.

Do you need assistance in submitting a comment to FDA? Does your company need training on FSMA? If so, contact me anytime.

On February 1, 2013 Many Food Facilities Face Suspension

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) extended the deadline for the biennial registration renewal for food facilities until January 31, 2013. Your time is almost up to re-register! If your not re-registered, enforcement will begin on February 1, 2013. FDA will cancel your Bioterrorism Act registration and your importations will be significantly delayed. Your facility will NOT be able to import, distribute or sell food products in the U.S.

Here's what you need to know about FDA's new FSMA requirement on Bioterrorism Act registrations. Owners, operators, or agents in charge of domestic or foreign facilities that manufacture/process, pack, or hold food, alcoholic beverages, and/or dietary supplements for consumption in the U.S. are required to register the facility with the FDA.

The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 (FSMA) has for the first time, specifically put the onus on importers to have a program to verify that the food products they are bringing into this country are safe. The idea behind FSMA is to change FDA regulatory enforcement and focus to more of a preventative approach, instead of reactionary. These new requirements include risk-based controls, foreign supplier verification program, certification, and audits. A brief overview of the requirements may be found here.

I've summarized the requirements relevant to your Bioterrorism Act Registration below, so you can be sure your registration doesn't lapse.

New Biennial Registration Requirements

FSMA amended the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) Section 415 to provide for biennial registration updates. Facilities which are required to register will have to re-register every 2 years, during the period beginning on October 1 (in this case, October 22) and ending on December 31 in even numbered years. This will first occur in October-December 2012 (which FDA extended until January 31, 2013, as renewals did not start until October 22).

Note that even facilities which are already registered with the FDA are still required to renew their registrations during the October 22– January 31, 2013 extended registration renewal period.

U.S. Agent

FDA requires that foreign facilities have a U.S. agent. The U.S. agent must:

1. Live or maintain a place of business in the U.S. and
2. Be physically present in the U.S. 

The U.S. Agent is also responsible for the payment of "reinspection fees" of foreign facilities and failure to comply with recall orders. Reinspections are follow-up inspections conducted by the FDA after a previous inspection by the FDA where the FDA identified non-compliance issues materially related to food safety. The purpose of the reinspection is to assure the issue has been remedied and food is now safely produced. Fees are adjusted each fiscal year. For FY 2013 (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2013), the fees are steep, at $221 an hour if no foreign travel is required, and $289 an hour if foreign travel is required.

Need a U.S. Agent?

The law firm Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. provides registration services and will act as a U.S. agent with the FDA for a nominal fee, but, the foreign facilities are always responsible for the payment of any reinspection fee or fee for a failure to comply with a recall order. Please visit www.FDA-USA.com for more information about how to make Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. your U.S. agent with the FDA. 

Contact Jennifer Diaz with any questions and ensure your importation are not delayed come February 1, 2013.

FDA Extends Until January 31 for Food Facilities to Re-Register

Below are the latest and greatest updates regarding compliance with the FDA's Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).  It includes background on FSMA, an update from FDA with 2 new guidance documents, FDA's extension to file biennial registrations, and an update on FDA using its enforcement power to suspend a facilities registration - meaning they can NOT import into the U.S.  FSMA Background

FSMA, enacted on January 4, 2011, amended section 415 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. § 350d]. The registration requirements in section 415 of the FD&C Act apples to domestic and foreign food facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food for human or animal consumption in the United States. Section 102 of FSMA amended section 415 of the FD&C Act in relevant part to provide that food facilities required to register with FDA must renew their registrations with FDA every other year, during the period beginning on October 1 and ending on December 31 of each even-numbered year, otherwise, their registration will be cancelled by the FDA.

Re-Inspection Fees

Importantly, please note that facilities will be charged reinspection fees by the FDA. Reinspections are follow-up inspections conducted by the FDA after a previous inspection by the FDA where the FDA identified non-compliance issues materially related to food safety. The purpose of the reinspection is to assure the issue has been remedied and food is now safely produced. Fees are adjusted each fiscal year. For FY 2013 (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2013), the fees are $221 an hour if no foreign travel is required, and $289 an hour if foreign travel is required. U.S. Agents will be responsible to assure these fees are collected.  

FDA EXTENSION

Because there was a delay in FDA’s implementation of biennial registration renewal for the 2012 cycle, and registration renewal did not become available until October 22, 2012, FDA's guidance document advised that FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion with respect to registration renewals submitted to FDA after December 31, 2012 for a period of 31 days, until January 31, 2013.

FDA published 2 guidance documents:

1. Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration (Fifth Edition).  This guidance document contains helpful questions and answers regarding food facility registration.
2. Guidance for Industry: What You Need To Know About Registration of Food Facilities; Small Entity Compliance Guide.  Thus guide was updated to reflect FSMA amendments to the FD&C Act, and discusses: who is required to register pursuant to the Bioterrorism

Suspension of Registration

FSMA also amended section 415 of the FD&C Act to provide FDA with the authority to suspend a food facility’s registration in certain circumstances involving food that has a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. FDA already used this power and suspended the registration of Sunland, a producer of nuts. The full story may be read here.